Can artificial intelligence replace lawyers? I often use AI platforms, primarily ChatGPT and DeepSeeker. I believe AI cannot replace lawyers. First, the output of AI platforms depends on accurately inputting questions, but many clients, without the help of a lawyer, don’t even know what questions to ask. Second, in a lawsuit, there may be dozens or even hundreds of legal issues. Only by asking every legal question precisely can AI achieve results close to those of a lawyer. Moreover, it requires human judgment to determine whether these answers are suitable for your case. Such tasks are generally beyond the capabilities of ordinary clients. Finally, a lawyer’s work is not limited to text-based tasks. For example, tasks like investigation and evidence collection must be done by humans. AI platforms are unable to perform such work. I am Attorney Lyu Qiang from Xuzhou. If you have any Chinese legal issues, feel free to contact me.
Phone Number (Available for English consultation ): (86)-516-1879-5428-064
E-mail: lvqiang#xuzhousoft.com (please replace # with ＠)